Home / Technology / Carnegie Mellon: We Didn’t Get $1M to Hack Tor

Carnegie Mellon: We Didn’t Get $1M to Hack Tor

Carnegie Mellon University this week denied reports it was paid by a FBI to assistance brand rapist suspects on a Dark Web.

“There have been a series of false media reports in new days per [our] Software Engineering Institute work in cybersecurity,” a university pronounced in a statement.

“In a march of a work, a university from time to time is served with subpoenas requesting information about investigate it has performed,” it continued. “The university abides by a order of law, complies with rightly released subpoenas, and receives no appropriation for a compliance.”

At emanate is a blog post from The Tor Project, that indicted Carnegie Mellon researchers of usurpation “at slightest $1 million” to conflict Tor and expose sum about those trafficking in bootleg products on Silk Road 2.0.

“Such movement is a defilement of a trust and simple discipline for reliable research,” a Tor Project wrote. “We strongly support eccentric investigate on a program and network, though this conflict crosses a essential line between investigate and endangering trusting users.”

Largely funded by a U.S. Defense Department, Carnegie Mellon’s Software Engineering Institute (SEI) is tasked with researching and identifying vulnerabilities in program and mechanism networks. Along a way, a organisation is infrequently served with sovereign subpoenas requesting information about a research.

In a statement, Carnegie Mellon did not residence Silk Road 2.0 directly. That box done headlines again final week when Vice’s Motherboard suggested that Carnegie Mellon hacked Tor and supposing information to a feds that led to a 2014 FBI raid on Tor users and several arrests.

Carnegie Mellon is not privately named in justice documents, though a invulnerability group for one of a group arrested for his impasse with Silk Road 2.0, Brian Richard Farrell, pronounced a feds found Farrell interjection to a assistance of a “university-based investigate institute,” Motherboard reports.

There are, of course, countless university-based investigate institutes in a U.S., though Motherboard says Carnegie Mellon is during a tip of that list in partial since of a display it was scheduled to give during Black Hat 2014 about weaknesses within a Tor network.

That display was cancelled on a eve of a discussion with small explanation. The outline of a talk, however, “bore a extraordinary resemblance” to a conflict on Tor that eventually helped a FBI expose a suspects, Motherboard says.

“This conflict … sets a discouraging precedent,” Tor pronounced in a blog post. “Civil liberties are underneath conflict if law coercion believes it can by-pass a manners of justification by outsourcing military work to universities.

“If academia uses ‘research’ as a stalking equine for remoteness invasion, a whole craving of confidence investigate will tumble into disrepute,” a post continued. “If this kind of FBI conflict by university substitute is accepted, no one will have suggestive 4th Amendment protections online and everybody is during risk.”

The FBI did not immediately respond to PCMag’s ask for comment.

Article source: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2495369,00.asp

Scroll To Top