Home / Health / Ebola’s Newest Victim: How a CDC arch became a media pinata

Ebola’s Newest Victim: How a CDC arch became a media pinata

There’s a flourishing media drumbeat on how to repair a Ebola crisis.

Tom Frieden should resign!

Yes, if a conduct of a Centers for Disease Control would usually step down, maybe we can get this thing licked.

Just a proceed a Secret Service miraculously increased certainty once Julia Pierson was shoved out. And a VA’s innumerable problems magically left after Eric Shinseki was forced out.

I’m not a large defender of Frieden. He seems rather robotic during his televised briefings, rattling off numbered articulate points. He doesn’t plan a lot of empathy. And he’s usually grudgingly certified that his group has finished several essential mistakes in doing a response to a pathogen and those who have been infected.

At a House contention yesterday, Frieden, an gifted medicine and open health official, used a same bedside manner, sensitively intoning “we will cruise all options” when pulpy on since a administration isn’t commanding some-more transport restrictions. As in his TV interviews, he doesn’t seem to know how to make news or promulgate a clarity of urgency.

But this seems to me to be a classical media response to a crisis, shortening it to a doubt of that heads should roll.

I’m all for domestic accountability: Government officials who do a lousy pursuit should be sent packing. And infrequently they should be sacked for reasons of domestic symbolism. But does anyone unequivocally trust that branch CDC over to an behaving executive will fast boost a agency’s performance?

Bill O’Reilly has demanded that Frieden be fired, pursuit him a “chief propagandist” for a “dumb and dangerous” proceed of awaiting airfield screening to be means to keep putrescent people out of a United States. 

But other distinguished voices during Fox aren’t shopping O’Reilly’s argument. Greta Van Susteren said, “I remonstrate totally with him. I consider Dr. Frieden has finished a good pursuit and we wish him to continue to lead this. … we consider Bill O’Reilly is passed wrong on this one.” 

On CNN.com, medicine Ford Vox says:

“After helming an group that likewise valid ill-prepared to accommodate a many critical mission, Frieden shouldn’t force a abdication issue like Shinseki did…At times, he’s seemed totally out of touch…

“Frieden is clearly a good male and will go on to do good things. But a President contingency now select someone improved attuned to a predicament caring purpose that has overtaken a rest of a CDC director’s pursuit description.”

Another doctor, Fox writer Manny Alvarez, says:

“I am some-more assured than ever that CDC director, Dr. Tom Frieden is not a right chairman for a job. And we contend this since this latest press contention consisted of him revelation a room of reporters what anyone who has ever dealt with Ebola in a past should have known…

“Frieden showed adult late to a diversion again on Ebola, that is not excusable when lives are during stake.”

Frieden isn’t a usually one whose boundary is on a line. There’s also a boss of a United States.

Obama, who had been permitting Frieden to be a face of a crisis, did his possess lecture on Ebola a other day. And he took a singular step of canceling dual days of fundraising.

“Optics, that Obama and his staff boot as never being most on their minds, always means a lot to this White House,” Politico says. “Aides in a past have forked out that any sudden changes to Obama’s news have a intensity to communicate some-more of a predicament than might exist.

“But confronting a risk of annoying juxtapositions of failing health caring workers while Obama was out campaigning, that’s accurately what they did.”

Obama substantially could hoop this from a road, though politically he had small choice. He doesn’t need any some-more golfing-style controversies.

The media’s increasingly partisan approach to a Ebola conflict is reflected in a open as well.

“According to a new ABC News/Washington Post survey, usually 54 percent of Republicans are assured in a sovereign government’s ability to respond effectively to Ebola — distant fewer than a 76 percent of Democrats who voiced confidence. This anticipating represents a distinguished annulment from a narrow-minded order found in a doubt about a potential avian influenza conflict in 2006, when a Republican, George W. Bush, was president. An ABC/Post check taken during a time found that 72 percent of Republicans were assured in an effective sovereign response compared with usually 52 percent of Democrats.”

That’s since “how is a administration doing X” is mostly a substitute doubt for how we perspective that administration, and even either we like a president. So Obama backers are some-more expected to default to a position of support, while his detractors are some-more expected to have small or no certainty in him.

No contention of a media’s Ebola coverage would be finish though looking during Shep Smith’s role. The maestro Fox News anchor challenged his possess contention to stop scaring people:

“Do not listen to a excitable voices on a radio or a radio or review a fear-provoking difference online. The people who contend and write excitable things are being really irresponsible.”

He also said:

“Suggestions have been finished publicly that leaders and medical professionals might be fibbing to us. Those suggestions are totally though basement in fact.  There is no justification of any kind of that we during Fox News are wakeful that leaders have lied about anything per Ebola. we news to  we with certainty this afternoon that being fearful during all is a wrong thing to do.”


“If there is widespread panic, it’s not formed in fact and it’s not formed in reason. And we consider some-more than anything those are usually difference that people on TV infrequently use…

We don’t have an outbreak, we have dual ill people from one failing man. And a rest of this should stop, since it’s not productive. And it’s not value ratings and it’s not value politics and we all need to stop it.”

That’s a absolute message. Most reporters are perplexing to cover a story responsibly, though a total sound turn has grown deafening. Will a media listen?

Click for some-more from Media Buzz.

Howard Kurtz is a Fox News researcher and a horde of “MediaBuzz” (Sundays 11 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET). He is a author of 5 books and is formed in Washington. Follow him during @HowardKurtz. Click here for some-more information on Howard Kurtz. 

Article source: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/10/17/ebolas-newest-victim-how-cdc-chief-became-media-pinata/

Scroll To Top