Home / Technology / FCC to AT&T: What’s Up With a Gigabit Internet ‘Pause’?

FCC to AT&T: What’s Up With a Gigabit Internet ‘Pause’?

The FCC would like some answers on ATT’s devise to “pause” a rollout of gigabit Internet service.

ATT Chief Randall Stephenson pronounced during a discussion this week that there is too most doubt surrounding net neutrality regulations for ATT to deposit in a costly rollout of a U-verse with Gigapower service.

“We can’t go out and only deposit that kind of income [without] meaningful underneath what manners that investment will be governed,” he said.

Stephenson committed to wiring adult 2 million households as compulsory by a ATT-DirecTV partnership deal, though over that, all bets are off.

The FCC, however, would like a bit some-more information about ATT’s plans. Jamillia Ferris with a FCC’s Office of General Counsel penned a Friday letter to Robert W. Quinn, Jr., ATT’s SVP of sovereign regulatory affairs, that requested specific sum about ATT’s fiber rollout.



Wilson, NC

Rochester, NY

Canby, OR

Seattle and More

Phoenix, AZ

Ferris asked Quinn for information on: a stream series of households to that fiber is deployed and a relapse by record and location; a sum series of households that were in line to get fiber before ATT motionless to postponement a plans; a series of households to that ATT still skeleton to yield fiber, including a 2 million underneath a DirecTV deal. Ferris also wants to know if ATT views a fiber investment as unprofitable.

She asked that Quinn contention responses by Nov. 21.

During a Friday coming on Fox Business Network, Stephenson pronounced that ATT is “making these investments that are long-term investments and we have to ask, underneath what manners will those be regulated in dual or 3 years? And until we have some kind of clarity to that, we’re going to have to unequivocally delayed ourselves down.”

ATT’s pierce comes after President Obama on Monday urged a FCC to reclassify broadband as a telecom service rather than an information use in a arriving net neutrality rules. The pierce would give a FCC some-more energy to umpire ISPs (like ATT) and wireless carriers.

On Fox, Stephenson pronounced that “you can delineate your possess opinions as to either [the president's idea] is a good thought or not,” though he clearly does not support it. He reiterated comments he finished during a discussion progressing this week: if a FCC moves forward with re-classification, they’ll substantially get sued.

That’s substantially not too distant off base. The highway to classifying broadband as an information use finished a approach to a Supreme Court around a Brand X case. Will reversing that preference need another outing to a High Court?

The whole reason a FCC is (again) examining net neutrality, meanwhile, is given Verizon sued a elect over a manners it authorized in 2010. Earlier this year, a justice sided with Verizon, anticipating that a FCC did not have a management to palm down those rules. But a justice did concur that a FCC could step in on Internet issues. So ever given then, a FCC has been perplexing to figure out how to pass manners that strengthen a Web though don’t prompt a ISPs to sue.

Re-classification would get a pursuit done, though it faces a outrageous fight. The easiest track would be for Congress to pass net neutrality rules. But a Republicans have long sided with a ISPs in observant that law is unnecessary, so with an incoming GOP Congress, net neutrality law is unlikely.

This is not a initial time ATT has balked over due regulations. In April, it pronounced it might withdraw from a inducement spectrum auction if a FCC imposed manners on a record that make it formidable for ATT to secure a spectrum it wants.

Check out a video next for more, And for cities that already have gigabit Internet, check out a slideshow above.

Article source: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2472218,00.asp

Scroll To Top