On Jul 30, she implored Chan to announce an general health emergency. Chan responded that she was being unequivocally pessimistic, Liu said.
Liu replied: “Dr. Chan, I’m not being pessimistic. I’m being realistic.”
Chan shortly flew to West Africa to accommodate with a presidents of Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone, and announced a $100 million pull to stop a outbreak.
On Aug. 8, a WHO announced a tellurian health emergency.
Chan declined to criticism for this article. The WHO’s Fukuda pronounced that if anyone asks either his classification did a ideal job, a answer will be, “Hell no.”
But after 6 trips to Africa during a epidemic, he has seen a some-more surpassing truth: Global organizations can yield epidemiologists and laboratory help, though what these resource-poor countries unequivocally need are front-line doctors and nurses, and simple resources. In Africa, patients told him, “We don’t have adequate food.”
He visited a hospital where 25 health-care workers became ill with Ebola and 23 died. Doctors kept going to work even as they were ostracized behind home by aroused neighbors. “This is unequivocally a surpassing turn of heroism,” Fukuda said.
In a pointer of fading certainty in a WHO’s ability to coordinate a response, U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon on Aug. 12 allocated David Nabarro, 65, a longtime troubleshooter, as comparison U.N. complement coordinator for Ebola. Nabarro had worked on avian influenza and a issue of a 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami. He was vacationing with his family during a beach in Kenya when he perceived a call seeking him to burst into a crisis.
Over a subsequent month, Nabarro would transport to 21 cities on 3 continents, perplexing to put together a bloc and display everybody an meaningful draft depicting 4 probable trajectories for a epidemic. The best-case unfolding showed it ending in a center of subsequent year. The misfortune box showed a “epi curve” rising in a wrong direction, toward a vertical, toward an unthinkable catastrophe.