Home / Travel / If Obama thinks Ebola is a ‘national confidence priority,’ because no transport ban?

If Obama thinks Ebola is a ‘national confidence priority,’ because no transport ban?

President Obama announced a Ebola conflict a “national confidence priority.” That was 3 weeks ago. Yet, he has unsuccessful to provide it as such.

He could anathema all transport into a U.S. of any chairman who has been in a influenced West African countries. He has a legal power to do so.

Why hasn’t he?

The elemental avocation of a nation’s arch executive is to strengthen a citizens. Under Article II of a Constitution, he is duty-bound to respond to threats and to control a country’s unfamiliar affairs. When a predicament presents itself, a boss has scarcely unobstructed energy and option to act. This includes safeguarding a health and reserve of Americans. Does interlude a lethal widespread of Ebola consecrate such a crisis?

“This is a amicable crisis, a charitable crisis, an mercantile crisis, and a hazard to inhabitant confidence over a conflict zones.” Those are a difference of a executive ubiquitous of World Health Organization during an puncture assembly of a United Nations Security Council.

So, yes… this is a crisis. A lethal one. In West Africa, Ebola has putrescent 6,500 people and killed 3,000. In one week alone, some-more than 700 new cases emerged. The illness is accelerating, not abating.

President Obama insisted that a chances of Ebola reaching a U.S. was “extremely low.” That was Sep 16th. A small 4 days later, a male putrescent with Ebola arrived here from Liberia — allegedly carrying lied during a airfield in Monrovia about either he’d had hit with anyone putrescent with Ebola. But his dishonesty would have unsuccessful had President Obama systematic a transport anathema on Sep 8th during a same time he was dogmatic Ebola a inhabitant confidence priority.

There is small doubt that other putrescent cases will strech a shores as a boss dithers.

The screening of travelers before boarding — on a arrogance that they can't broadcast a illness until they are symptomatic– is so unsound as to be ludicrous. The executive of a Centers for Disease Control confirms that an putrescent traveler could pass a screening during incubation, though turn symptomatic on a plane. Or when he arrives. By afterwards it is too late. And given a initial symptoms impersonate a accumulation of illnesses, including a common cold, a traveler could go for days undetected and undiagnosed. All a while, a illness is transmitted to many others with whom he comes in hit here in a U.S.

Which brings adult another canard on that a White House relies: transmission. We are positive that Ebola is widespread by approach hit with blood, mucus, spit and other corporeal fluids from an putrescent person. As if that’s supposed to make us feel safer. We’re told it can't be transmitted by a air. Seriously? Think about that. Let’s contend an putrescent newcomer gets past screening and starts coughing, that is a body’s healthy resource to leave a lungs. Any scientist will tell we that when someone coughs, little droplets of spit are projected from a mouth and into a atmosphere a stretch of 7 to 12 feet. It is mostly invisible to a exposed eye, though it can be inhaled by others and enter their respiratory tract or differently be ingested. It can also land on surfaces. This is how a influenza pathogen is mostly transmitted and spreads. Why not a Ebola virus?

A U.S. anathema on atmosphere transport from a nations influenced by Ebola creates sense. Multiple countries have finished so. And so have some American companies, including Exxon Mobil. Several airlines have cancelled all flights. What is a downside? Economic loss? How does a financial cost start to review to a intensity detriment of tellurian lives?

Past U.S. presidents have exercised their inherent management to hospital transport bans whenever American lives were in jeopardy. Indeed, so has President Obama. In July, all flights to Israel were temporarily taboo since a sharpening assault threatened a reserve of a adults roving there. A identical anathema to Lebanon was imposed after a 1985 hijacking of a TWA jetliner to Beirut. The comfortless events of 9-11 also stirred serious transport restrictions to strengthen inhabitant security.

A allied health-related anathema occurred during a tallness of a AIDS epidemic. President Reagan imposed a breach on HIV-positive foreigners. Years later, President Clinton sealed into law a check that codified a ban. Thus, there is plenty authorised precedent.

The lethal Ebola continues to harm West African countries and threatens to expand over a continent. If it is, as President Obama claims, a “national confidence priority,” because afterwards has he unsuccessful or refused to make a health and reserve of American lives a priority?

Gregg Jarrett is a Fox News Anchor and former invulnerability attorney.

+ FollowFoxNewsOpinion on Facebook

Article source: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2014/10/03/if-obama-thinks-ebola-is-national-security-priority-why-no-travel-ban/

Scroll To Top