Home / Science / Is private spaceflight safe? (+video)

Is private spaceflight safe? (+video)

British billionaire Sir Richard Branson had hoped to float SpaceShipTwo with his dual adult children as early as subsequent year, kicking off Virgin Galactic’s initial blurb flights to suborbital space.

But final Friday (Oct. 31), during a rocket-powered exam moody from California’s Mojave Air and Space Port, SpaceShipTwo pennyless detached in midair, withdrawal one commander passed and another severely injured.

Industry experts are austere that a deadly collision doesn’t spell doom for space tourism, yet it is a vital reversal for Virgin Galactic, and a 10-year-old association will expected have to answer pivotal reserve questions in a months and years ahead. [Virgin Galactic's SpaceShipTwo Crash: Full Coverage]


Private spaceflight’s tough week

Virgin Galactic’s collision capped a brutal week for a blurb space industry.

Three days earlier, another blurb spaceflight company, Orbital Sciences Corp., mislaid a Antares rocket as it launched from a seashore of Virginia. The rocket exploded moments after liftoff on Tuesday night (Oct. 28), destroying Orbital’s unmanned Cygnus spacecraft, that was firm for a International Space Station to broach load for NASA.

The causes of both accidents sojourn unclear.

“Space is hard, and now was a tough day,” Virgin Galactic CEO George Whitesides told reporters during a news contention Friday. “We are going to be supporting a investigation as we figure out what happened today, and we’re going to get by it.”

Industry leaders echoed Whitesides’ sentiments.

“The changed life that was mislaid can't be transposed and will never be forgotten,” Commercial Spaceflight Federation President Eric Stallmer pronounced in a statement. “The bravery of both pilots will offer as impulse for us all to continue to accommodate a hurdles of spaceflight with transparent concentration and integrity in sequence to make it as protected and arguable as possible.”

Stallmer’s predecessor, former NASA wanderer Michael Lopez-Alegria, who is now an eccentric consultant, pronounced in an email: “I’m assured that a blurb spaceflight attention can and will tarry this and a apparently separate though tragically coincidental Antares launch failure.”


The destiny of blurb space

Other experts pronounced it would be foolish to try to envision a destiny of a blurb spaceflight attention from a twin disasters. [The Top 10 Private Spaceships]

“I cruise a usually thing they have in common is a word ‘private,’” pronounced John Logsdon, a space-policy consultant and highbrow emeritus during George Washington University in Washington, D.C. “The dual accidents have probably zero to do with one another, and sketch extended conclusions from them is a red herring.”

Orbital Sciences sealed a $1.9 billion agreement with NASA in 2008 to fly 8 unmanned load missions to a space hire regulating Antares and Cygnus. The Dulles, Virginia-based company, that was founded in 1982, successfully finished a initial dual central missions this year.

Virgin Galactic’s business is in a fledgling margin of space tourism. The association has a list of some-more than 700 business who have paid adult to $250,000 any for a brief float to suborbital space aboard a six-passenger, two-pilot SpaceShipTwo.

Virgin Galactic had designed to have a swift of fiv­e of those spacecraft, done by a Mojave-based association Scaled Composites.

Both of a pilots aboard SpaceShipTwo Friday,Michael Alsbury and Peter Siebold, were Scaled Composites employees; Alsbury was killed and Siebold stays in a hospital.

Friday’s comfortless pile-up was not a initial deadly collision during a growth of SpaceShipTwo. In 2007, 3 Scaled employees were killed during a tank blast on a ground.


Virgin Galactic’s trail to space

Virgin Galactic has regularly pushed behind a estimated start date for blurb flights, and a association never announced when SpaceShipTwo would strech a limit altitude.

SpaceShipTwo is designed to be carried to an altitude of 50,000 feet (15,000 meters) underneath a mothership, WhiteKnightTwo. After a space craft is released, it is ostensible to blast off to 62 miles (100 kilometers) above a planet.

During a last rocket-powered flight, in January, SpaceShipTwo soared to a highest-yet altitude of 71,000 feet (21,641 m). Friday noted a 55th exam moody and fourth powered moody of SpaceShipTwo. Experts contend these forms of initial flights are inherently risky.

“The inlet of exam flights is that disaster is one of a possibilities,” Logsdon said. “If we demeanour during a story of exam flights of high-performance airplanes, there have been a lot of accidents. It’s hapless though not totally unexpected.” [Photos of SpaceShipTwo's Test Flights]

But Virgin Galactic’s idea to start blurb flights in 2015 seemed to indicate a comparatively low series of designed exam flights, Logsdon added. Once Virgin Galactic has another aircraft to work with, they’ll expected have to control an endless set of exam flights to remonstrate people that they’re safe, he said.

National Transportation Safety Board — a sovereign group leading a investigation — have warned opposite conjecture until a ongoing review is complete. But critics have done clever claims about risks a association took.

Tom Bower, a biographer of Branson, told BBC Radio 4 that a collision was “predictable and inevitable.” Joel Glenn Brenner, a former Washington Post contributor who has been following Virgin Galactic’s progress,made identical charges shortly after a collision in an coming on CNN, adding: “I don’t see them during slightest being means to lift anybody into space in a subsequent 10 years.”

Andrea Gini, of a Netherlands-based International Association for a Advancement of Space Safety, criticized Virgin Galactic for a miss of clarity about a reserve procedures.

“We don’t know how Scaled Composites approached this sold test,” Gini told Space.com in an email. “Virgin Galactic has always refused to attend to a open contention inside a space reserve community, and has never sought a support of eccentric reviewers.”

Gini pronounced there are elements of Virgin Galactic’s moody pattern that experts cruise hazardous. The preference to fly passengers and even organisation though pressurized space suits, for example, could display them to risk of decompression, he said.

“Space is, and will always be, a unsure industry,” Gini said. “But it is not a new one. we trust that blurb operators should proceed it with clarity and humility, or their business, and not usually their vehicles, will be cursed to failure.”


A nascent space industry

Still, blurb space attention advocates worry that regulations could put gloomy restrictions on a suborbital moody attention before it ever gets off a ground.

Charles Lurio, a space attention researcher who publishes The Lurio Report, said, if anything, Virgin Galactic’s collision illustrates a need for some-more players in a blurb space attention to make technologies like suborbital flights unsentimental and safe.

“We usually have dual companies that are practically in a diversion for suborbital tellurian spaceflight, and what they’re fighting opposite is a movement of people meditative it’s so impossibly tough that usually a large group can try it,” Lurio told Space.com.

Besides Virgin Galactic, XCOR Aerospace is now building a suborbital system; tickets for a float on XCOR’s one-passenger Lynx space plane, that is also designed to fly to an altitude of about 62 miles (100 kilometers), are offered for $100,000.

“The wrong doctrine would be to interpretation it’s too dangerous to try these new paths,” Lurio said. “We should have not dual companies though 10 companies perplexing out suborbital systems.”

It could be months, or even a year, before investigators know what went wrong during Friday’s deadly flight. Officials with a NTSB pronounced they would expected spend adult to a week examining a pile-up site, afterwards another 12 months interpreting their findings.

Follow Megan Gannon on Twitter and Google+. Follow us @SPACEdotcom, Facebook or Google+. Originally published on Space.com.

Copyright 2014 SPACE.com, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This element might not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Article source: http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2014/1104/Is-private-spaceflight-safe-video

Scroll To Top