BUFFALO — Prosecutors forsaken a rape review opposite Chicago Blackhawks star Patrick Kane on Thursday, citing a miss of convincing justification in a box “rife with reasonable doubt” and pronounced a prosecution no longer wanted to cooperate.
Erie County District Attorney Frank Sedita pronounced a three-month review found that earthy and debate justification “tend to contradict” a accuser’s explain that she was raped final Aug. 2 during Kane’s offseason home outward Buffalo.
“The DNA formula lend no certification whatsoever to a complainant’s claim,” pronounced Sedita, who motionless opposite presenting a box to a grand jury for probable charges. Sedita pronounced a 21-year-old prosecution had recently sealed an confirmation observant she did not wish to press charges.
“The assemblage of a convincing justification — a explanation — does not amply justify a complainant’s claim that she was raped by Patrick Kane,” Sedita said, “and this supposed ‘case’ is abundant with reasonable doubt.”
The preference ends a high-profile review that led to Kane’s dismissal from a cover of a renouned NHL video game, and chants of “She pronounced no!” and “No means no!” during a integrate of early highway games for a Blackhawks and their star winger, a former No. 1 altogether breeze pick.
“We knew all along that Patrick didn’t do anything wrong,” his agent, Pat Brisson, pronounced in a content to The Associated Press. “We are gratified with a formula from a investigation. It’s finally concluded.”
A chairman who answered a accuser’s mother’s cellphone hung adult Thursday when contacted by The AP. The accuser’s lawyer, Roland Cercone, did not immediately lapse a summary left seeking comment. The Blackhawks were roving to New Jersey for a diversion Friday night.
advertisement | publicize on newsday
The box dominated headlines in Buffalo and Chicago for weeks. At 26, Kane is one of a NHL’s tip immature stars and he has won 3 Stanley Cup championships in Chicago over a past 6 years, including final season. He had been in difficulty before, too, arrested after an rumpus with a cab motorist in Buffalo in a summer of 2009, and photos of him merrymaking are simply found online. But a attack box was by distant a many critical claim Kane had faced.
Kane’s day to be spent with a Stanley Cup was Aug. 8, yet he called off a open arrangement of a iconic prize since of a review and instead spent a day with his family and friends.
He stayed out of steer after a review became public, and afterwards reported to training stay with a rest of a Blackhawks in September. With a group confronting complicated critique for permitting him to play during a investigation, a star winger was assimilated by tip Blackhawks executives for an ungainly news discussion where he pronounced he would be excluded of any indiscretion and brushed aside any questions that overwhelmed on a situation.
“The really formidable partial of this is when we are fundamentally an general sports star, and as a result, a expected target,” Kane’s attorney, Paul Cambria, pronounced Thursday. “And we have to go by 3 months of reading things in a media that we know are not true, and they’re hurtful things and accusatory things. That’s a really formidable weight to bear.”
On and off a ice, though, there have been no open signs of any aria or disappointment from Kane. He has a indicate strain of 8 games and leads Chicago with 8 goals and 10 assists. When asked about a review this season, he has mostly stranded with respectful comments that he was simply watchful for a prosecutor’s decision.
“After a consummate investigation, we determine with a district attorney. We’re not astounded that they did not go forward,” Cambria said. “And we determine that a box is abundant with doubt.”
Signs of difficulty seemed in Sep when, in a weird array of events, a accuser’s attorney, Tom Eoannou, announced that a woman’s mom had found an dull justification bag in her doorway. The profession quit a box a brief time later, observant he no longer believed a mother’s story. Sedita called a episode, apparently meant to expel doubt on how justification in a box had been handled, “a weird hoax.”