IF AN “irresponsible” Barack Obama moves terrorists from Guantánamo Bay to a troops jail in Kansas, he would be portrayal a aim on each sanatorium and propagandize in a area. That is a perspective of a state’s comparison senator, Pat Roberts. “Not on my watch,” Mr Roberts positive supporters huddled in a rain-lashed selling mall in Wichita on Oct 13th, to most acclaim and nodding of heads. Mr Roberts, a 78-year-old Republican, promises to hindrance all Senate business, if need be, to stop a boss from emptying a jail stay in Cuba and promulgation a remaining detainees to Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, home to America’s usually maximum-security troops prison.
Pedants competence intent that Leavenworth has not indeed been asked to take any detainees—though a Kansas jail was one of several sites deliberate in 2009, after Mr Obama took bureau dogmatic that he would tighten Guantánamo in a matter of months. No matter. A new press report—denied, a bit half-heartedly, by a White House—suggested that officials are introspective how a boss competence use executive powers to tighten Guantánamo before his tenure ends, if Congress maintains a stream anathema on relocating detainees to a mainland. Americans have been put in a jumpy mood by grave tellurian headlines, lending a “safety-first” corner to mid-term congressional elections on Nov 4th.
If a Republicans win a Senate…
More to a point, Mr Roberts is confronting a tough re-election fight, yet Kansas is a solidly regressive level state. After 34 years in Congress he finds himself in a parsimonious spot, squeezed between internal Tea Party purists (who consider he has lost his Kansas roots) and old-school assuage Republicans (tempted by an eccentric candidate, Greg Orman, who says both parties have lost how to compromise).
All in all, Mr Roberts has each inducement to speak adult fights with a White House. Asked to theory during a president’s motives, he frowns. Mr Obama thinks that shutting Guantánamo “will make things improved in a Muslim world”, he ventures. Perhaps, he goes on, a boss thinks that Islamic State fighters will say: “Oh, that’s wonderful.”
Other Republicans, led by a Speaker of a House of Representatives, John Boehner, have indicted a boss of being “eager” to move terrorists into a country, and have pulpy Democrats to malign him (Mr Orman, for his part, calls Mr Obama “absolutely wrong” to wish Guantánamo detainees on American soil). Critics are on organisation domestic ground: given 2009 polls have shown two-thirds of Americans against to shutting Guantánamo and relocating detainees to a mainland.
Understandably, Republican leaders wish a 2014 choosing to be a referendum on Mr Obama, and what they see as his weak, genuine doing of a universe on fire. Ask Kansans given they do not wish to accept any of a 149 remaining Guantánamo detainees, and echoes of that censure come up. “Sure, we have super-max prisons, they wouldn’t escape,” says a late oil-worker in Wichita, Ken Jarvis. But once in America they would be postulated lawyers sensitive to their cause, he predicts, adding darkly: “There’s substantially Muslim attorneys.” Before long, he thinks, dangerous group would be giveaway to travel a streets.
When Leavenworth final suspicion it competence be receiving Guantánamo detainees, 5 years ago, 95% of locals were opposed, says a mayor, Mark Preisinger. Not given Leavenworth, a stout city of red section and grey mill beside a Missouri river, is disposed to hysteria. It has been a jail city given a 19th century. Between a army, a sovereign government, a state of Kansas and a private corrections corporation, 5 vast prisons fruit in and around a city. It is a troops town, home to chosen staff colleges for high-flying officers from America and abroad. The city high propagandize sends between 20 and 30 students a year into a armed forces. Still, residents feel in “lockstep” that a place to keep a detainees is Guantánamo, says a mayor.
That jail camp—built in an American naval bottom confirmed by covenant on Cuba’s eastern tip—is called a authorised limbo, scoffs a internal Republican state senator, Steve Fitzgerald. Well, good. “Why shouldn’t they only rot?” he asks, office many detainees non-professional to enter a criminal-justice complement and undeserving of a station of prisoners-of-war.
If we can't be loved, let us be feared
During these and other Kansan conversations, it becomes transparent that a politics of Guantánamo involves not only a outcome on Mr Obama. In this security-tinged election, America is also carrying a discuss about a bequest of George W. Bush. Go behind to a 2008 election, and Mr Obama spoke like a male with a unconditional charge to retreat a priorities of a Bush era. Where his prototype had hold general laws cheap, Team Obama would revive America’s tellurian station (and shutting Guantánamo would symbolize that uninformed start). America is war-weary, Mr Obama pronounced repeatedly: time for some nation-building during home, and sketch a line underneath unconstrained war.
The justification is ascent that Mr Obama misread his mandate. In such regressive places as Leavenworth, people are not certain America is war-weary. “The republic hasn’t been during war, it’s been a military,” says Eric Hollister, a late lieutenant-colonel and maestro of Iraq who instructs cadets during a high school. The past 13 years have frequency been like a second universe war, he adds, when America dug Victory Gardens to addition rations.
The republic is positively fed adult with calls to repair a world: Democrats and Republicans comparison contend it is not America’s office to take a lead in elucidate general problems. But distant from thanking Mr Obama for delivering a cautious, hesitant unfamiliar process that such polls would seem to demand, electorate are branch on him. The Guantánamo tale helps to explain this puzzle. Americans do not wish unconstrained war. But right now, many put feeling protected above a office of peace.