Home / Politics / The Politics of Silicon Valley

The Politics of Silicon Valley

Over a march of my career as a record journalist, I’ve found that Silicon Valley is home to a singular domestic and dignified ideology: a pro-business liberalism that mostly gets mistaken as libertarianism. Philosophically, people who found Internet startups (“founders”) are best described as idealists: They trust that there is always a improved resolution to problems, a resolution that advantages many people and reduces conflict.

A lot of writers have scratched their heads perplexing to systematise Silicon Valley’s surprising politics, pursuit it “quasi-libertarian” and “peer progressivism.” Back in a ’80s, a tech-obsessed coterie of a Democratic celebration called themselves “Atari Democrats.”

I consider these terms never stranded since zero ever unequivocally restrained their ideology. That’s since we set out to investigate a politics of Silicon Valley some-more thoroughly. Over a subsequent few weeks, I’ll share what we schooled in a array of posts.

As partial of my research, we polled 129 Silicon Valley founders about their faith systems (you can learn some-more about my methodology here—please feel giveaway to share your questions and feedback on my methodology in a comments). Here’s an overview of some pivotal characteristics we detected as we worked toward formulating a clarification of a Valley’s domestic category:

Most Tech Founders Belong To The Democratic Party

Eighty-three percent of employees during tip tech firms gave income to President Obama‘s choosing debate in 2012, and 64% of donations from founders and investors have left to Democratic candidates. Forty-three percent of startup founders self-identify as Democrats—while 31% don’t brand with any domestic party.

Founders Tend To Be Libertarian-ish

There are a lot of critiques of Silicon Valley’s politics. Nearly all of them claim, in some form or another, that a tech chosen are apolitical technocrats who usually wish a supervision to get out of their hair while they build products that solve problems many improved than bureaucrats ever could. Indeed, many startup founders seem like libertarians —at slightest when it comes to giveaway trade and labor unions:

Like Democrats, Founders Support Government Programs

Founders are mostly fans of sovereign programs. Uber CEO Travis Kalanick (who, for a prolonged time, prominently displayed Ayn Rand’s The Fountainhead as his Twitter avatar) seems to like Obamacare, declaring: “[Obamacare is] huge. . . . The democratization of those forms of advantages [allows] people to have some-more stretchable ways to make a living. They don’t have to be operative for The Man.” (More on since Obamacare is good for Uber here).

When a Wall Street Journal op-ed discounting a purpose of supervision creation went viral, Google executive and Internet “godfather” Vint Cerf went livid, accusing a author of blatantly misreading history. “The U.S. government, including [military agencies] ARPA, NSF, DOE, NASA, among others, positively facilitated, underwrote, and pioneered a expansion of a Internet,” he fumed. “The private zone intent around 12 years into a module (about 1984–85) and was unequivocally many concerned in powering a widespread of a system. But nothing of this would have happened though [the government's] investigate support.”

Many founders adore some large supervision programs. They are not your run-of-the-mill libertarians.

Many Founders Are Optimists

From a horses’ mouths:

“I am an optimist. we consider we need to be, to be an entrepreneur.” ~ Facebook owner Mark Zuckerberg

“I’m maybe a many confident authority we know. we mean, I’m impossibly optimistic. I’m confident arguably to a fault, generally in terms of new ideas.” ~ Netscape owner and financier Marc Andreessen

“What creates Silicon Valley special? Eternal confidence of a innovative mind.” ~ Tech blogger Om Malik

“I’m a pathologically confident person.” ~ Wikipedia owner Jimmy Wales

Calling oneself an optimist is some-more than usually feathery rhetoric; it’s founded on dual core philosophical assumptions about a world:

1) Change will scarcely always make things improved
2) There’s no fundamental dispute between vital groups in multitude (for example: workers vs. corporations, adults vs. government, or America vs. other nations).

Founders’ multiply of confidence or faith is secure in a faith that many of amiability have a same goals—and anytime we consider we’ve found a good resolution toward those goals, there’s always a improved resolution value exploring. Change, over a prolonged run, is scarcely always good in a mind of a standard Silicon Valley founder. To interrupt simply means to strew imperfection, exposing ever some-more ideal solutions beneath.

Founders Believe All Problems Are Information Problems

Scroll To Top